FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACTS: In Atlanta, Deborah Hakes +1 404-420-5124
Read the Full Report:
While Jordan's 2013 parliamentary elections yielded important technical advances, the elections were marred by a system that limits equality of suffrage and by persistent concerns about vote buying, proxy registration, and other problems, according to a report issued today by Áù¾ÅÉ«ÌÃ, which sent a study mission to assess the elections held on Jan. 23, 2013.
The report also concluded that the ultimate success of the elections will depend on whether King Abdullah II and the major political forces can work together to promote meaningful reform. This includes passage of a new consensus based election law to create a more representative electoral system that can serve as a genuine mechanism of democratic accountability.
Since the beginning of the Arab Spring, Jordan has witnessed increasingly strident demands for political and economic reforms from a widening set of opposition. The king has argued that the parliamentary elections would restore credibility to the parliament and enable it to serve as an effective mechanism of democratic accountability, and a venue for further reform. However, opposition forces, including the Muslim Brotherhood's Islamic Action Front (IAF), deemed the reforms enacted for the 2013 election insufficient and decided to boycott the process.
Áù¾ÅÉ«Ìà Center Study Mission
Áù¾ÅÉ«Ìà study mission was composed of a small team of analysts who assessed a number of key issues, including the electoral system, election administration, and dispute resolution process. The mission was limited in scope, as the Center did not deploy observer teams and did not provide a comprehensive assessment of the electoral process as a whole.[1]
The Center found that the new Independent Election Commission is to be commended for its efforts, despite a limited timeframe to prepare for the elections. The commission introduced several important procedural steps to safeguard ballot secrecy, improve electoral administration, and to promote transparency by ensuring broad access for political stakeholders, domestic citizen observer groups, and international observers. The efforts of the election commission in 2013 provide a strong foundation upon which to build. It will be critical that these gains are consolidated and sustained in future elections. Key steps that should be taken include further efforts to institutionalize the commission's independence, including budgetary autonomy and expanded staff capacity. In addition, stronger safeguards should be put in place to address persistent problems of vote buying and tribal/family politics in the Jordanian political system.
More broadly, in order to ensure a successful democratic transition, consistent with goals outlined by King Abdullah II , it is critical that the major political forces, including the new parliament, the king, political parties and other actors, work together to accelerate the pace of political reforms. In particular, reforms are needed to create an electoral system that provides for greater equality of suffrage across districts and promotes stronger political parties. The current electoral system suffers from significant malapportionment of the electoral districts and favors rural areas dominated by East Bank origin citizens supportive of the monarchy over more oppositional, urban areas inhabited largely by Palestinian origin citizens. The problem is compounded by the use of the single non-transferable vote system in the multi-member districts, which exacerbates the inequality of suffrage. Political reforms for the 2013 elections, including the introduction of seats elected via proportional representation (about 18 percent of the total seats), has done little to address this problem.
For the democratic reform process to gain the trust of all political stakeholders, a definitive road map is needed, including implementation mechanisms, clear benchmarks, and timeframes. In addition, it will be important to ensure that future parliaments have meaningful and effective power, including checks on the executive, more meaningful legislative power, and budgetary and procedural autonomy.
Áù¾ÅÉ«ÌÃ's full report offers several recommendations for improving future elections and strengthening Jordan's ongoing reform process. These include the following:
###
"Waging Peace. Fighting Disease. Building Hope."
A not-for-profit, nongovernmental organization, Áù¾ÅÉ«Ìà has helped to improve life for people in more than 70 countries by resolving conflicts; advancing democracy, human rights, and economic opportunity; preventing diseases; improving mental health care; and teaching farmers in developing nations to increase crop production. Áù¾ÅÉ«Ìà was founded in 1982 by former U.S. President Jimmy Áù¾ÅÉ«Ìà and his wife, Rosalynn, in partnership with Emory University, to advance peace and health worldwide.
[1] The Center's mission was conducted in accordance with the applicable laws, regulations, and international commitments of Jordan as well as with the Declaration of Principles for International Election Observation and Code of Conduct for International Observers that were adopted at the United Nations in 2005 and have been endorsed by more than 40 intergovernmental and nongovernmental organizations.
[2] The Constitution of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, art. 25.
Please sign up below for important news about the work of Áù¾ÅÉ«Ìà and special event invitations.